A More Conservative Approach in the Surgical Management of Pediatric Physeal Ankle Fractures Should be Preferred: Mid to Long-term Functional Outcomes of Three Different Surgical Techniques for Salter-Harris Type II and Triplane Distal Tibial Fractures

Abstract

Background: Pediatric physeal ankle fractures carry a high risk of complications. This study aimed to (1) investigate the effect of anatomic reduction of the physis on mid to long-term functional outcomes in Salter-Harris type II and triplane distal tibial physeal fractures (DTPFs) and (2) compare the outcomes of 3 different surgical techniques applied in these fractures.Methods: The database of a single level-I trauma center was retrospectively reviewed for DTPFs between 2012 and 2022. A total of 39 eligible patients with operative Salter-Harris type II and triplane fractures between 2012 and 2022 were included. Surgical treatment methods were closed reduction-percutaneous fixation (CR-PF), open reduction-screw fixation, or open reduction-plate fixation. Patients were further divided into subgroups for fractures reduced anatomically (<1 mm) or nonanatomically (1 to 3 mm). The primary outcome measures were the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Score, ankle range of motion, presence of premature physeal closure and angular deformities, and Takakura ankle osteoarthritis grade.Results: A total of 39 patients were included, with an average age of 12.9 +/- 2.2 years. The mean follow-up time was 68.9 +/- 38.0 months. The CR-PF group had higher postoperative fracture displacement (P = 0.011). American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores were excellent in all groups, statistically similar between surgical techniques, and similar between anatomic and nonanatomic reduction groups. The CR-PF group (P =0.030) and nonanatomic reduction (P = 0.030) provided a significantly lower ankle osteoarthritis rate. All 4 patients with premature physeal closure were observed in patients treated with open techniques.Conclusions: CR-PF for the treatment of DTPFs should be preferred in suitable cases as it is less invasive and provides satisfactory mid to long-term functional outcomes without increasing complications compared with anatomic reduction and open techniques.