Comparison of Medical Treatments According to the Characteristics of Idiopathic Premature Ventricular Contractions: Beta-blockers or Calcium Channel Blockers?

dc.authorid0000-0002-9205-5708
dc.contributor.authorBaycan, Ömer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorFidan, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Fatma Betul
dc.contributor.authorTatlisu, Mustafa Adem
dc.contributor.authorOzyildirim, Serhan
dc.contributor.authorÇalışkan, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:58:00Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are a common arrhythmic condition. The first approach in patients with symptomatic and frequent PVC is medical treatment, primarily beta-blockers (BB) or calcium channel blockers (CCB), but it is still unclear which of the two should be chosen. This study investigated which drug treatment would be beneficial according to patient and electrocardiography (ECG) characteristics in patients with idiopathic PVC.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 156 patients with PVC who came to the cardiology outpatient clinic. Seventy-one patients were responsive to BB, and 85 were responsive to CCB. Their demographic and ECG characteristics were compared.Results: The male ratio was higher (p<0.001), and the left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). Although the mean heart rate was higher in BB responders (p<0.001), the initial PVC burden was lower in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). The PVC QRS duration was longer in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). Similarly, the coupling interval variability was higher in BB responders (p=0.006).Conclusions: The evaluation of clinical and ECG parameters in patients with frequent idiopathic PVCs may determine whether BBs or CCBs should be chosen as initial treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to verify our findings and establish their clinical applicability.
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.00532
dc.identifier.endpage38
dc.identifier.issn2149-2042
dc.identifier.issn2149-4606
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid36974457
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85152658532
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage32
dc.identifier.trdizinid1169911
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.00532
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1169911
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/13410
dc.identifier.volume38
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001109597700014
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGalenos Publ House
dc.relation.ispartofMedeniyet Medical Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectPremature ventricular contraction
dc.subjectventricular arrhythmia
dc.subjectB-blocker
dc.subjectcalcium channel blocker
dc.subjectambulatory ECG monitoring
dc.titleComparison of Medical Treatments According to the Characteristics of Idiopathic Premature Ventricular Contractions: Beta-blockers or Calcium Channel Blockers?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
13410.pdf
Boyut:
344.48 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format