Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Ishtiaq
dc.contributor.authorMustafaoglu, Rustem
dc.contributor.authorYeldan, Ipek
dc.contributor.authorYasaci, Zeynal
dc.contributor.authorErhan, Belgin
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T15:24:00Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: To qualitatively synthesize and quantitatively evaluate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with COVID-19. Data Sources: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2020 to April 2022. Data Selection: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PR on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and QoL in patients with COVID-19. Data Extraction: The mean difference (MD) and a 95% CI were estimated for all the outcome measures using random effect models. The following data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers: (1) first author; (2) publication year; (3) nationality; (4) number of patients included (5) comorbidities; (6) ventilatory support; (7) length of inpatient stay; (8) type of PR; (9) outcome measures; and (10) main findings. The risk of bias was evaluated using the cochrane risk of bias tool. Data Synthesis: A total of 8 RCTs involving 449 participants were included in the review. PR was found to be significantly effective in improving dyspnea (5 studies, SMD -2.11 [95% CI, -2.96 to -1.27; P<.001]) and exercise capacity (MD 65.85 m [95% CI, 42.86 to 88.83; P<.001]) in patients with both acute and chronic COVID-19 with mild to severe symptoms, whereas fatigue (MD -2.42 [95% CI, -2.72 to -2.11, P<.05]) and lung functions (MD 0.26 L [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.48, P<.05]) were significantly improved in acute COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms. The effect of PR on QoL was inconsistent across studies. PR was found to be safe and feasible for patients with COVID-19. Conclusion: Evidence from studies indicates that PR program is superior to no intervention in improving dyspnea, exercise capacity, lung functions, and fatigue in patients with COVID-19. PR appears to be safe and beneficial for both acute and chronic COVID-19 patients. © 2022 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.007
dc.identifier.endpage2062
dc.identifier.issn0003-9993
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.identifier.pmid35908659
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85137033786
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage2051
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.007
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/6587
dc.identifier.volume103
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherW.B. Saunders
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğer
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20250302
dc.subjectCOVID-19; Dyspnea; Exercise capacity; Pulmonary rehabilitation; Rehabilitation; SARS-COV-2
dc.titleEffect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
dc.typeReview

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
6578.pdf
Boyut:
1.54 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format