Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
| dc.contributor.author | Ahmed, Ishtiaq | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mustafaoglu, Rustem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yeldan, Ipek | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yasaci, Zeynal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Erhan, Belgin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-10T15:24:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.department | İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: To qualitatively synthesize and quantitatively evaluate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with COVID-19. Data Sources: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2020 to April 2022. Data Selection: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PR on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and QoL in patients with COVID-19. Data Extraction: The mean difference (MD) and a 95% CI were estimated for all the outcome measures using random effect models. The following data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers: (1) first author; (2) publication year; (3) nationality; (4) number of patients included (5) comorbidities; (6) ventilatory support; (7) length of inpatient stay; (8) type of PR; (9) outcome measures; and (10) main findings. The risk of bias was evaluated using the cochrane risk of bias tool. Data Synthesis: A total of 8 RCTs involving 449 participants were included in the review. PR was found to be significantly effective in improving dyspnea (5 studies, SMD -2.11 [95% CI, -2.96 to -1.27; P<.001]) and exercise capacity (MD 65.85 m [95% CI, 42.86 to 88.83; P<.001]) in patients with both acute and chronic COVID-19 with mild to severe symptoms, whereas fatigue (MD -2.42 [95% CI, -2.72 to -2.11, P<.05]) and lung functions (MD 0.26 L [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.48, P<.05]) were significantly improved in acute COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms. The effect of PR on QoL was inconsistent across studies. PR was found to be safe and feasible for patients with COVID-19. Conclusion: Evidence from studies indicates that PR program is superior to no intervention in improving dyspnea, exercise capacity, lung functions, and fatigue in patients with COVID-19. PR appears to be safe and beneficial for both acute and chronic COVID-19 patients. © 2022 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.007 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 2062 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0003-9993 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 10 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 35908659 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85137033786 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 2051 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.007 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/6587 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 103 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | W.B. Saunders | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Diğer | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_Scopus_20250302 | |
| dc.subject | COVID-19; Dyspnea; Exercise capacity; Pulmonary rehabilitation; Rehabilitation; SARS-COV-2 | |
| dc.title | Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis | |
| dc.type | Review |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1










