Vestibulo-ocular reflex evaluation of the children with acquired esotropia

dc.authorid0000-0002-0934-8084
dc.authorid0000-0002-9636-812X
dc.authorid0000-0002-0673-7818
dc.authorid0000-0002-6803-5467
dc.authorid0000-0002-9803-9258
dc.authorid0000-0001-9022-921X
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Basak
dc.contributor.authorTopcu, Merve Torun
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorHepokur, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorGunes, Medine
dc.contributor.authorOğuz, Halit
dc.contributor.authorKalciog, Mahmut Tayyar
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:49:47Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to evaluate the effects of acquired esotropia on vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain in children using video (vHIT) and functional head impulse (fHIT) tests. Methods: A total of 62 children aged 6-18 years, with acquired esotropia and normal vision, were evaluated in the study. The patients were divided into two sub-groups: accommodative and non-accommodative. VOR gains were analyzed by performing lateral canal vHIT and fHIT with monocular and binocular recordings by a single examiner. Results: Seventeen (10 male, 7 female) children with accommodative esotropia, 24 (14 male, 10 female) children with non-accommodative esotropia, and 21 (8 male and 12 female) healthy controls were included in this study. The vHIT findings did not differ between the groups (p>.05). In the non-accommodative esotropia group, the location of the camera in both binocular and monocular vHIT recordings made a significant difference in the left VOR gain (p = .025, z = -2.243, p = .032, and z = -2.143, respectively), but no difference was observed in the right VOR gain. In the accommodative esotropia group, while the camera was on the left there was a significant difference in the right VOR gain between binocular and monocular recordings (p = .016, z = -2.413) but no difference was observed in the left VOR gain. No overt or covert saccade was detected in any group. Conclusions: The statistical differences found in vHIT and fHIT in acquired esotropia patients are thought to be sporadic and based on the results of this study no correction or change in recording technique is required for vHIT or fHIT in children with acquired esotropia.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111170
dc.identifier.issn0165-5876
dc.identifier.issn1872-8464
dc.identifier.pmid35537362
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85129466112
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111170
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/12152
dc.identifier.volume158
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000803840600005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectAcquired esotropia
dc.subjectVestibulo-ocular reflex
dc.subjectVideo head impulse test
dc.subjectFunctional head impulse test
dc.titleVestibulo-ocular reflex evaluation of the children with acquired esotropia
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar