Comparison of glomerular filtration rate measurements with the two-plasma sample technique using Tc-99m DTPA and other methods in donor candidates for renal transplantation

dc.authorid0000-0002-2645-7661
dc.authorid0000-0002-9132-9092
dc.contributor.authorAyan, Arif Kursad
dc.contributor.authorVaroglu, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorSeven, Bedri
dc.contributor.authorUyanik, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorOrsal, Ebru
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:59:07Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground/aim: Accurate measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the evaluation of renal functions in potential kidney donors is associated with important outcomes for both the donor and recipient. We intended to determine the efficacy of various methods while estimating GFR in potential living kidney donors. Materials and methods: Fifty-three potential kidney donors (31 females, 22 males; mean age: 50.1 years) were included in this study. GFR was estimated simultaneously using the following methods: Gates' method, Cockcroft-Gault (CG) and modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) prediction equations, and the two-plasma sample (TPS) technique. Using TPS as the reference method, the estimations of GFR with the other methods were compared with that of TPS. Results: The mean +/- SD GFR was 86.43 +/- 11.37 mL min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) with TPS. GFR values calculated using Gates' method and MDRD 1, MDRD 2, reexpressed MDRD, and CG prediction equations were 105.25 +/- 16.12 mL min(-1) 1.73 m(-2), 114.63 +/- 32.51 mL min(-1) 1.73 m(-2), 113.2 +/- 35.23 mL min(-1) 1.73 m(-2), 104.23 +/- 23.12 mL min(-1) 1.73 m(-2), and 99.35 +/- 20.01 mL min(-1) 1.73 m(-2), respectively. While there was a strong statistically significant correlation between the TPS and Gates' methods, moderate correlation was found between TPS and the MDRD 1, MDRD 2, and reexpressed MDRD prediction equations. Conclusion: Our results indicated that the performance of Gates' method in total GFR estimation was better than the prediction equations in potential kidney donors.
dc.identifier.doi10.3906/sag-1403-58
dc.identifier.endpage1032
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.issn1303-6165
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pmid27513400
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84975879167
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1025
dc.identifier.trdizinid249169
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1403-58
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/249169
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/13753
dc.identifier.volume46
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000378646700013
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTubitak Scientific & Technological Research Council Turkey
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Medical Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectGlomerular filtration rate
dc.subjectkidney donors
dc.subjecttwo-plasma sample
dc.titleComparison of glomerular filtration rate measurements with the two-plasma sample technique using Tc-99m DTPA and other methods in donor candidates for renal transplantation
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
13753.pdf
Boyut:
1.35 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format