Enhancement of motor skill acquisition by intermittent theta burst stimulation: a pilot study

dc.authorid0000-0002-6403-4133
dc.authorid0000-0002-5058-2374
dc.authorid0000-0002-4694-4440
dc.contributor.authorKolbasi, Esma Nur
dc.contributor.authorHuseyinsinoglu, Burcu Ersoz
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorBayraktaroglu, Zubeyir
dc.contributor.authorSoysal, Aysun
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:48:10Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective This study aims to analyze the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on motor skill acquisition of healthy subjects when applied on alternate days to ensure high adherence to treatment. Materials and methods Ten healthy participants (40-54 years) were included in the study. The control group (CG) (60% female) only received motor training (i.e., finger tapping task-FTTa), whereas the experimental group (EG) (100% female) received iTBS in addition to the motor training (every other day for 5 sessions). Cortical excitability measurements were taken with TMS. The correct sequences of the finger tapping test (FTTe) were recorded for behavioral analysis. Results While SICI was increased by 0.03 in EG, ICF was increased by 0.18 between pre-and post-treatment. On the other hand, CG had a lower ICF difference (MD: 0.05) and a higher SICI difference (MD: 0.21). There was no difference between EG and CG in FTTe at the end of the intervention (p > 0.05 for all variables), except for the increased number of correct sequences within the EG (p = 0.018). There was a significant difference in FTTa between EG and CG, in favor of EG (p = 0.042). The effect size was 0.62. Conclusion Although no difference was found in terms of cortical excitability and FTTe between the EG and CG at the end of the alternate-day treatment, it seemed like iTBS increased cortical facilitation further than CG. Furthermore, the number of correct sequences in FTTe and FTTa was significantly increased in EG, showing that intermittent iTBS might improve motor learning and performance.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13760-022-02155-0
dc.identifier.endpage977
dc.identifier.issn0300-9009
dc.identifier.issn2240-2993
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid36508110
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85143779041
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage971
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-022-02155-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/11613
dc.identifier.volume123
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000898295000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelberg
dc.relation.ispartofActa Neurologica Belgica
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectMotor cortex
dc.subjectTranscranial magnetic stimulation
dc.subjectMotor skills
dc.subjectMemory and learning tests
dc.subjectMotor evoked potentials
dc.titleEnhancement of motor skill acquisition by intermittent theta burst stimulation: a pilot study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar