Surgeons’ perspectives on artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making in trauma and emergency contexts: results from an international survey
| dc.contributor.author | Cobianchi, Lorenzo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Piccolo, Daniele | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dal Mas, Francesca | |
| dc.contributor.author | Agnoletti, Vanni | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ansaloni, Luca | |
| dc.contributor.author | Balch, Jeremy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Biffl, Walter | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-10T15:24:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.department | İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining traction in medicine and surgery. AI-based applications can offer tools to examine high-volume data to inform predictive analytics that supports complex decision-making processes. Time-sensitive trauma and emergency contexts are often challenging. The study aims to investigate trauma and emergency surgeons’ knowledge and perception of using AI-based tools in clinical decision-making processes. Methods: An online survey grounded on literature regarding AI-enabled surgical decision-making aids was created by a multidisciplinary committee and endorsed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). The survey was advertised to 917 WSES members through the society’s website and Twitter profile. Results: 650 surgeons from 71 countries in five continents participated in the survey. Results depict the presence of technology enthusiasts and skeptics and surgeons’ preference toward more classical decision-making aids like clinical guidelines, traditional training, and the support of their multidisciplinary colleagues. A lack of knowledge about several AI-related aspects emerges and is associated with mistrust. Discussion: The trauma and emergency surgical community is divided into those who firmly believe in the potential of AI and those who do not understand or trust AI-enabled surgical decision-making aids. Academic societies and surgical training programs should promote a foundational, working knowledge of clinical AI. © The Author(s) 2023. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s13017-022-00467-3 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1749-7922 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 36597105 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85145428951 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00467-3 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/6641 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 18 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | BioMed Central Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | World Journal of Emergency Surgery | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_Scopus_20250302 | |
| dc.subject | Artificial intelligence; Clinical decision-making; Decision aids; Survey; Trauma and emergency surgery | |
| dc.title | Surgeons’ perspectives on artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making in trauma and emergency contexts: results from an international survey | |
| dc.type | Article |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1










