The clinical relevance of cut-off percentage for high-grade urothelial carcinoma within low-grade urothelial carcinoma: A determining factor?
| dc.contributor.author | Kır, Gözde | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cecikoglu, Gozde Ecem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aydin, Abdullah | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yıldırım, Asıf | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-10T15:21:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.department | İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | Aims: The aim of the study was to analyze the cut-off value for the percentage of the high-grade (HG) component that has clinical significance in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Material and Methods: The study included a total of 362 patients, mixed-grade UC (MGUC) patients were classified as Combine Group (CG) 1 based on the presence of less than 5% HG areas. High-grade papillary UC (HGPUC) patients were grouped based on HG component proportions: CG2 (?5%–<50% HG), CG3 (?50%–<100% HG), and pure HGPUC (PHGPUC) for 100% HG components. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between low-grade papillary UC (LGPUC) and CG1, CG2, or CG3, as well as LGPUC and PHGPUC, in terms of cancer-specific survival (CSS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 19.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.30–171.10 P = 0.007, HR = 28.38, 95% CI = 3.50–229.97 P = 0.002, HR = 18.64, 95% CI = 2.26–153.64 P = 0.007, and HR = 35.41, 95% CI = 4.61–271.72 P < 0.001, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between PHGPUC and CG1, CG2, or CG3 in terms of CSS. Conclusions: These findings suggest that even the presence of less than 5% HGPUC within LGPUC significantly impacts CSS. Furthermore, the increase in the percentage of HGPUC beyond 5% does not substantially influence the CSS. Based on these findings, disclosing the percentage of the high-grade component may be crucial for future patient management and treatment. © 2024 Elsevier Inc. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.016 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1078-1439 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85208179210 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.016 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/6203 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_Scopus_20250302 | |
| dc.subject | Combine group; Cut-off value; Mixed-grade; Survival; Urothelial carcinoma | |
| dc.title | The clinical relevance of cut-off percentage for high-grade urothelial carcinoma within low-grade urothelial carcinoma: A determining factor? | |
| dc.type | Article |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1










