A retrospective analysis of early and late term complications in patients who underwent application of retention sutures for gastrointestinal tract malignancies

dc.authorid0000-0002-4583-3917
dc.authorid0000-0001-5794-1547
dc.authorid0000-0002-4111-0885
dc.authorid0000-0003-2807-5437
dc.contributor.authorBayraktar, Barış
dc.contributor.authorÖzemir, İbrahim Ali
dc.contributor.authorSagiroglu, Julide
dc.contributor.authorDemiral, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Yahya
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorTombalak, Ercument
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-10T19:31:53Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: Complications associated with wound healing after abdominal tumor operations continue to be a significant problem. This study aimed to determine the significance of retention sutures in preventing these complications. For this purpose, early and late term results of patients who underwent application of polydioxanone (PDS) and additional retention sutures for abdominal closure were retrospectively evaluated. Material and Methods: Clinical files of 172 patients who were operated due to gastrointestinal tract malignancies in our clinic between January 2007 and January 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients in whom the fascia was repaired only with PDS (Group 1) were compared to patients in whom the fascia was repaired with PDS and retention sutures (Group 2) in terms of age, gender, postoperative evisceration-wound infection (<1 month)-incisional hernia (>1 month), incision type, co-morbid factors, and operative time. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age or gender (p=0.680 and p=0.763). No significant difference was detected in terms of postoperative incisional hernia (p=0.064). Evisceration and post-operative wound infection were significantly lower in Group 2 as compared to Group 1 (p=0.008 and p=0.002). Operative time was significantly longer in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p<0.0001). Co-morbid features were significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (p<0.0001). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of incision type (p=0.743). Conclusion: In the presence of co-morbid factors that disrupt wound healing in surgical patients with gastrointestinal malignancy, retention suture can be safely used as a supplement for optimal wound care.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/UCD.2014.2352
dc.identifier.endpage19
dc.identifier.issn1300-0705
dc.identifier.issn1308-8521
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid25931939
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84925816179
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage15
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2014.2352
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14730/8068
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000370846000004
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherAves
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250302
dc.subjectAbdominal wound dehiscence
dc.subjecthernia
dc.subjectpolydioxanone
dc.subjectwound closure techniques
dc.titleA retrospective analysis of early and late term complications in patients who underwent application of retention sutures for gastrointestinal tract malignancies
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
8068.pdf
Boyut:
175.48 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format